Facebook Ad Costs in 2026: CPC, CPM by Country + Budget

You've probably already read two or three benchmark posts about Facebook ad costs. And you probably noticed they all say something different. One says CPC is 0.70. Another says 1.92. A third one says "it depends" and then gives you a wall of text without a single usable number.

They're all technically right. And that's the problem.

Facebook ad costs in 2026 aren't one number. They're a moving outcome of your campaign objective, your target geography, your placement mix, your creative quality, and how much conversion volume you're actually feeding the algorithm. Meta's own help center confirms that ad auctions factor in estimated action rates, and ads with lower quality rankings tend to cost more and distribute less efficiently. At AdManage, we've managed over $50M in Meta ad spend across brands like MVF, Nextdoor, Photoroom, and Zoe, and we see this pattern every single day: the advertisers who understand why costs vary are the ones who actually control them.

This guide gives you the real 2026 benchmark numbers first, then explains why every other benchmark post seems to contradict the last one, and then walks you through the budget math that actually matters, including the learning-phase formula most guides skip entirely.

One quick framing note before we get into numbers. When marketers say "Facebook ads," they almost always mean blended Meta inventory. Your ads can run across Facebook, Instagram, Messenger, WhatsApp, and Audience Network, and Threads feed is now automatically included in eligible Advantage+ placements. That alone explains a chunk of why benchmark posts disagree: they're measuring different slices of the same auction system.

Facebook Ad Cost Benchmarks for 2026 You Can Actually Use

Short answer: in 2026, Facebook (Meta) ads run about $0.70 CPC for traffic and $1.92 CPC for lead-gen, with blended ecommerce landing near $16.80 CPM and a $0.87 CPC. Your actual cost swings with objective, country, placements, and creative quality, so treat these as starting points, not fixed prices.

If you need benchmark numbers right now (and you probably do, or you wouldn't be here), start with these. All figures are USD.

By campaign objective:

Sources: WordStream's 2025 Facebook Ads benchmarks (traffic and lead-gen CPC/CPL data), Adamigo's 2026 objective-level Meta benchmarks (CPM ranges by objective).

Blended ecommerce performance (the MHI dataset):

MHI's February 2026 benchmark report, based on 1,247 Meta ad accounts and $87 million of 2025 ad spend, found these blended ecommerce averages:

- $16.80 CPM

- $0.87 CPC

- 2.7% conversion rate

- $32.22 CPA

- 3.4x ROAS

This is one of the largest recent datasets available, and it's worth anchoring to because the sample size makes the averages more stable than most single-source benchmarks. For industry-level CPM breakdowns, see our Facebook CPM benchmarks by industry guide.

Geography changes everything:

Country-level CPM differences are staggering. Lebesgue's March 2026 ecommerce data puts CPM at roughly $16.08 in the US, $11.81 in the UK, and $1.36 in India. A separate Adamigo benchmark shows the US as high as $23 CPM in its sample, with Nigeria around $1.50.

Costs are rising, not falling:

Triple Whale's April 2026 benchmark report found that Meta CPM rose 20.03% year over year in 2025. Every industry in their dataset got more expensive on CPM. Not some. Every single one.

Worth anchoring to: there's no single "2026 Facebook ad cost." There are costs for your objective, your geo, your audience, your placements, and your creative quality. Use benchmarks as guardrails, not as a price list.

If you've noticed that other benchmark posts cite completely different numbers, that's not an accident. It's actually telling you something important about how Meta's auction works.

Why Facebook Ad Cost Benchmarks Contradict Each Other

Four things explain almost all the disagreement.

1. Objective mix.

A January 2026 benchmark split by objective put awareness CPM around 10-15, traffic around 15-25, sales around 20-30, and leads around 30-45. That's the same platform with completely different auction economics depending on what you're optimizing for. If one article mixes all objectives together and another isolates lead-gen, the averages will never match. Understanding how cost per lead breaks down across industries helps you set realistic expectations for your specific vertical.

2. Dataset scope.

MHI's ecommerce sample landed at $16.80 CPM blended across verticals. Lebesgue's March 2026 industry breakdown placed most industries roughly in the $7-$9 CPM range, with beauty and health at $12.46 and hardware and automotive at $6.96. Both datasets can be "true" simultaneously because they're measuring different account mixes, different verticals, and different campaign compositions.

3. Placement mix.

Meta's own documentation says the delivery system is designed to get the lowest average cost overall, not the lowest cost for each individual placement. If one benchmark is mostly feed placements and another includes broad Advantage+ delivery across Reels, Stories, and Audience Network, the CPC and CPM profiles will look different even for the same advertisers.

4. Stale data hiding behind fresh dates.

This one is subtle and important. One still-circulating WordStream benchmark page was "last updated" in September 2025, but its source data actually came from November 2016 to January 2017. In 2026, you should care more about the data window than the blog publish date.

So if benchmarks are this context-dependent, what actually drives your costs up or down?

What Actually Drives Your Facebook Ad Costs

How Campaign Objective Affects Facebook Ad Cost

Traffic is still the cheapest way to buy clicks on Meta. Lead-gen gets more expensive because the platform is optimizing for a harder action (someone filling out a form, not just clicking). Sales campaigns get more expensive again, especially in competitive markets where the algorithm is hunting for purchases or high-value conversions. The objective-level benchmarks show this gradient clearly: you're not just buying impressions, you're buying the quality of the impression, and harder conversion goals cost more to fulfill. Our guide to running a successful Facebook ad campaign covers how to match your objective to your budget reality.

How Geographic Targeting Affects Facebook Ad Costs

This is the most under-appreciated cost lever in Facebook advertising.

Same platform. Almost a 12x difference in media cost before you even touch creative, offer, or landing page. (Source: Lebesgue's March 2026 ecommerce country CPM data.)

Cheaper reach doesn't automatically mean better profitability (intent and purchasing power matter), but it absolutely changes budget planning. If you're running campaigns in multiple countries and treating them as one budget line, you're probably misreading your performance data.

Which Countries Have the Highest Facebook CPM in 2026?

The United States is consistently the most expensive market. Lebesgue's March 2026 data puts US CPM around $16.08, and a separate Adamigo benchmark shows it running as high as $23 in its sample. Other mature, high-purchasing-power markets like the United Kingdom (around $11.81 CPM) sit in the next tier down. The pattern is simple: the more advertisers competing for a wealthy, high-intent audience, the higher the auction clears.

Which Countries Have the Cheapest Facebook CPM in 2026?

Emerging markets are dramatically cheaper on a pure media basis. India comes in around $1.36 CPM in Lebesgue's ecommerce data, and Adamigo puts Nigeria near $1.50. That's more than a 10x gap versus the US on cost per thousand impressions alone. The catch: cheap impressions don't guarantee cheap outcomes. Purchasing power and buyer intent vary just as much as CPM does, so a low-CPM market can still deliver a high cost per sale if the audience doesn't convert.

How Seasonality Drives Up Facebook Ad Costs

If you plan budgets as if Q4 behaves like Q1, you will get punched in the face by the auction. Triple Whale's April 2026 report found CPM inflation across every industry in 2025, and multiple 2026 benchmark sources still flag Q4 as the most expensive period because of holiday competition from retail, ecommerce, and direct-to-consumer brands flooding the auction.

October through December are a different pricing season. Budget for them that way. Our Q4 creative scaling guide walks through how to prepare your creative pipeline before the auction heats up.

Why Creative Quality Determines Your Facebook Ad Costs

Meta is direct about this: higher-quality ads perform better in the auction, and lower-quality ads tend to cost more and get distributed less efficiently. If your quality ranking, engagement rate ranking, or conversion rate ranking is weak (you can check these in Ads Manager under the "Ad Relevance Diagnostics" column preset), cheaper targeting tricks usually won't save you for long.

The fastest path to lower costs is often better creative, not more complicated bidding. We see this consistently: teams that test more creative variations find winners faster, and winners bring costs down because the auction rewards engagement.

How Placement Selection Affects Facebook Ad Costs

Meta recommends Advantage+ placements because broader placement access gives the delivery system more room to find efficient inventory. Meta also says adding more placements doesn't increase your ad cost by itself, and that delivery optimizes for the lowest average cost overall.

Removing placements just because one looks expensive in a breakdown report can actually shrink your delivery surface and make learning harder. Unless you have a real, tested reason to exclude a placement (brand safety, creative format mismatch), leave the system room to work. For a comparison of Advantage+ versus manual creative control, we break down when each approach makes sense.

Meta's New 2026 Location Fees: What Advertisers Need to Know

Starting July 1, 2026, Meta will charge location fees of 2% to 5% for ads delivered in the UK, France, Italy, Spain, Austria, and Turkey. The fee is separate from your campaign budget and appears as a distinct line item on your invoice.

What this means in practice: if you spend 10,000 delivering ads in the UK after July 1, the location fee alone is roughly another 200 before other taxes. If you advertise across multiple affected markets, those fees stack. Build them into your 2026 budget forecast now, not in August when you get the first invoice.

Knowing your cost drivers is half the equation. The other half is turning those numbers into a budget that gives the algorithm enough room to actually learn.

How to Set a Facebook Ads Budget That Actually Works

Most "how much should I spend on Facebook ads" advice starts with a random monthly number. That's backwards.

The right question isn't "what's the minimum I can spend?" It's "how much does my specific goal cost, and can I buy enough events for the system to learn?"

Here are the four formulas you need:

That's your baseline. Plug in the benchmarks from the first section (or better yet, your own historical data) and you get a starting number grounded in reality instead of guesswork. For a complete walkthrough of the math, our Facebook ads budget calculator guide explains each formula in detail.

Want to model these numbers for your specific account? Try our free Facebook ad cost calculator. It walks you through the math with current benchmark data so you can build a budget that actually maps to your goals.

But choosing the right budget formula only matters if the budget is large enough for the algorithm to learn in the first place. And that brings us to the single most important (and most ignored) piece of Facebook ad budget planning.

Facebook Ads Daily Budget vs. Lifetime Budget: Which to Use

Before we get to learning-phase math, a quick tactical note on budget types.

Meta defines a daily budget as the average amount you want to spend per day. It is not a hard cap. Meta may spend up to 75% over your daily budget on some days, though total spend won't exceed 7x your daily budget over a calendar week. For campaigns shorter than seven days, total spend won't exceed daily budget multiplied by the number of days.

Lifetime budgets, on the other hand, represent the total amount you want to spend over the full run of a campaign or ad set.

In practice:

- Daily budgets work better for evergreen campaigns: ongoing lead-gen, ecommerce, and continuous creative testing where there's no fixed end date.

- Lifetime budgets make more sense for fixed-window promotions: a holiday sale, a product launch, a time-bound offer where you need the budget to pace across a defined flight.

The choice between daily and lifetime is a tactical one, and it intersects with how you allocate budget across ad sets. Our guide to CBO vs ABO budget strategies covers when campaign-level versus ad-set-level budgeting makes sense. But the budget structure only matters if the budget itself is large enough for the algorithm to learn. And that's where most advertisers get tripped up.

Facebook Ads Learning Phase: The Budget Math Most Advertisers Skip

This is the part that separates "technically running ads" from "running ads in a way that can actually stabilize and improve."

Meta's help documentation says ad sets usually need around 50 optimized conversion events to exit the learning phase. "Learning limited" means the system is unlikely to receive about 50 optimization events in the week after your last significant edit. If your ad set is predicted to get zero conversions, Meta says you may have chosen a conversion event that doesn't happen frequently enough.

So the useful formula for a lower-funnel campaign is:

Learning-phase daily budget floor = target CPA × 50 ÷ 7

Worked example with a $30 target CPA:

- 50 purchases per week needed for stable learning

- Budget floor = $30 × 50 ÷ 7 = ~$214/day per ad set

That's why a $20/day purchase campaign so often feels random and unstable. At a $30 CPA, $20/day only buys about 4.7 purchases per week on average. The system is being starved of the data it needs to optimize. Our complete Facebook Ads learning phase guide explains why this happens and how to exit learning faster.

There's a second Meta rule worth knowing: if you use the cost per result goal bid strategy, Meta says your daily budget should be at least 5x the amount of that goal. So if your target CPA is $30, Meta's own minimum-budget guidance is $150/day. Our guide to cost cap vs bid cap strategies walks through how to set these correctly.

The 5x rule is a floor. The 50-events rule is what real learning stability looks like.

What does this look like in actual dollar terms? Here are four scenarios that match common campaign objectives.

Facebook Ad Budget Examples for Every Goal in 2026

Facebook Awareness Campaign Budget

If you want 100,000 impressions and your awareness CPM lands around $10-$15 (the current objective-level benchmark range), your starting budget is about $1,000-$1,500.

Facebook Traffic Campaign Budget

If you want 1,000 clicks and your traffic CPC is near the current $0.70 benchmark, plan on about $700. If your account runs closer to high-cost blended traffic, the same click goal can easily move above $1,000.

Facebook Lead Generation Campaign Budget

If you need 50 leads and your CPL is around the current $27.66 benchmark, your baseline media budget is about $1,383. If you're still testing creatives, add buffer on top. Benchmarks are averages, not guarantees, and early campaigns almost always run above average until the algorithm finds signal. For industry-level CPL ranges, our cost per lead benchmarks break the numbers down across 15 verticals.

Facebook Ecommerce Campaign Budget

If you need 100 purchases and your CPA target is around $30-$32 (roughly in line with MHI's 2026 ecommerce benchmarks), your baseline budget is roughly $3,000-$3,200. For a full playbook on pushing spend up without losing efficiency at this level, see our guide on how to scale Facebook ads profitably.

But remember the learning-phase math: if you want one purchase-optimized ad set to learn cleanly, the daily budget requirement is much higher than most first-time advertisers expect. At 30 CPA, you need roughly 214/day per ad set for stable learning.

These numbers assume you have enough budget for the optimization event you picked. If you don't, there's a better path than just spending more.

What to Do When Your Budget Can't Feed 50 Conversions

Don't force a lower-funnel optimization event that your budget can't support. Meta's own troubleshooting guidance says if an ad set is predicted to get zero conversions, you may have picked an event that doesn't happen frequently enough.

The fix is usually one of three things:

① Consolidate ad sets. Instead of spreading a small budget across five cold audiences, combine them into one or two ad sets. More budget per ad set means more events per ad set, which means faster learning. Meta's delivery guidance explicitly recommends consolidation for this reason. If you're unsure how many ad sets to run, our guide on how many Facebook ads to run at once covers the framework.

② Optimize for a more frequent event. If purchases are too rare for your budget, optimize for add-to-cart, initiate checkout, or landing page views. You'll get more signal, faster learning, and more stable delivery.

③ Move up-funnel. If you can only spend a few hundred dollars, traffic campaigns, landing page views, lead forms, or retargeting often make more sense than cold purchase optimization. There's no shame in running a traffic campaign when the alternative is a purchase campaign that never exits learning.

The goal is to feed the algorithm enough data to learn, regardless of where in the funnel that data comes from. A well-optimized traffic campaign at 500/month will almost always outperform a purchase campaign at 500/month that's permanently stuck in learning.

How to Lower Facebook Ad Costs Without Wrecking Performance

Six strategies that actually work, ranked roughly by impact.

Fix Your Creative Before Touching Bid Caps

Meta says lower-quality ads tend to cost more. So before you start doing clever bid gymnastics, check your quality ranking, engagement rate ranking, and conversion rate ranking in Ads Manager. If those are weak, your problem is usually the ad itself, the offer, or the message-market fit. No amount of targeting refinement fixes a bad ad. If your creative is performing but fatiguing, our guide to diagnosing creative fatigue shows how to catch the warning signs early.

Stop Spreading Your Budget Across Too Many Ad Sets

Meta's delivery guidance explicitly says to consolidate ad sets and hit around 50 optimized conversion events per ad set. Spreading a small budget across five cold ad sets is just a slow way to buy noisy data. Fewer ad sets with more budget each will almost always outperform.

Widen Placements Unless You Have a Real Reason Not To

Meta recommends Advantage+ placements and says the system optimizes for the lowest average cost overall, not the cheapest-looking placement on each row of a breakdown. Removing placements just because one looks expensive can shrink the delivery surface and make learning harder.

Separate High-Cost and Low-Cost Geos

If the US CPM is ~$16 and India is ~$1.36 in your reference dataset, lumping them together can let the cheaper market dominate delivery and distort your benchmark reading. Split geos when economics are materially different so each market gets the budget treatment it needs.

Plan Your Facebook Ad Budget for Q4 Before October

Triple Whale's April 2026 report shows CPM inflation was broad-based in 2025, and current 2026 benchmark sources still flag Q4 as the most expensive period. If Q4 matters for your business, build that inflation into your forecast in advance. The brands that win Q4 are the ones that planned their creative pipeline and testing budget before October, not the ones scrambling in November.

Stop Treating CPM as the Whole Game

A higher CPM does not automatically mean worse performance. Lebesgue's 2026 industry guide makes this point directly. Expensive impressions can still be profitable if click-through rate, conversion rate, and customer value are strong. Cheap impressions with weak intent are just cheaper waste.

The metric that matters is your cost per outcome (CPA, CPL, ROAS), not your cost per thousand impressions. Our guide to reducing Facebook ads CPA breaks down the specific levers you can pull.

But there's a cost lever most advertisers never think about, and it has nothing to do with bidding, targeting, or placements. It's the speed at which you can test creative variations.

How AdManage Cuts the Hidden Cost of Slow Ad Launches

Here's a pattern we see constantly at AdManage: a team knows they need to test more creative. They've read the benchmarks. They understand that creative quality drives down costs. But they're stuck launching 20-30 ads a day inside native Ads Manager because each one takes 5-10 minutes of manual setup, naming, UTM tagging, and quality checking.

That's not a strategy problem. That's an execution bottleneck. And it's costing you more than you think.

When you can only launch 20 variations a week, your creative learning cycle stretches from days into weeks. Your best-performing creative gets found slower. Your losing creatives burn budget longer before you catch them. And your cost per acquisition stays higher than it needs to be because the algorithm hasn't found the creative combination that truly resonates with your audience.

AdManage solves the launch bottleneck directly:

→ Bulk launching at scale. Launch hundreds or thousands of ad variations across Meta, TikTok, Google Ads, Pinterest, Snapchat, and AppLovin in a single batch. Our status page shows roughly 494,000 ads launched in the last 30 days alone, saving teams an estimated 37,000+ hours of manual work. Our complete Facebook ads bulk upload guide shows how the process works step by step.

→ Standardized naming and UTM enforcement. Every ad launches with consistent naming conventions and UTM parameters. No more manually checking that each variation has the right tags. No more "which campaign was that?" three weeks later.

→ Post ID preservation. When you launch new ad variations through AdManage, you can preserve social proof (likes, comments, shares) from existing posts instead of starting from zero every time. That accumulated social proof makes your ads look more credible to users, which improves engagement, which improves your quality ranking, which lowers your costs. It's a compounding loop.

→ Creative testing that actually compounds. When launching 500 variations takes the same time as launching 5, you can test more aggressively. More tests means faster signal on what works. Faster signal means you can identify winning ads sooner and scale winners faster. That's how you lower CPA structurally, not just tactically.

The math is simple: if every manual ad launch takes ~10 minutes, 1,000 ads represents roughly 166 hours of human time. At a fully-loaded ad-ops rate of $55/hour, that's about $9,200 per thousand ads in labor cost alone. AdManage compresses that to minutes.

If you're spending thousands on media but launching ads one at a time, the launch bottleneck is silently inflating your real cost per acquisition.

Ready to see the pricing? Check out our plans starting at GBP 499/month with no ad-spend tax.

Key Facebook Ads Changes in 2026 Advertisers Should Know

Two structural shifts stand out this year.

Automation is now central, not optional. In MHI's February 2026 ecommerce benchmark study, Advantage+ shopping campaigns represented 62% of ecommerce conversion spend in 2025, up from 34% in 2024. That doesn't mean manual campaigns are dead. It means your benchmark reality is increasingly shaped by algorithmic campaign management, broader placement mixes, and less granular manual control. If your cost benchmarks come from a world of manual campaign structures and your competitors are running Advantage+, the comparison may not be apples to apples. For a full breakdown of what automation actually delivers, see our guides to Facebook ads automation and Advantage+ vs manual creative.

Billing got more complex. The July 1, 2026 location fees are real, they're separate from campaign budgets, and they matter if you advertise into the UK, France, Italy, Spain, Austria, or Turkey. If you ignore them, your "Facebook ad cost" model is incomplete. Build them into your Q3 and Q4 forecasts now.

Facebook Ad Cost FAQs

How Much Does It Cost to Advertise on Facebook in 2026?

It depends on what you're buying, but here are the anchors. Buying clicks costs roughly $0.70 CPC for traffic and $1.92 CPC for lead-gen. Buying reach runs about $16.80 CPM for blended ecommerce, with country CPM swinging from around $1.36 in India to $16.08 in the US. Buying outcomes lands near a $27.66 CPL for leads and a $32.22 CPA for ecommerce purchases. So a campaign that needs 1,000 clicks at the traffic benchmark starts around $700, while 50 leads at benchmark CPL is closer to $1,383. The number that matters for your account is the one tied to your objective, geo, and creative, not a blanket average.

What Is a Good Facebook CPC in 2026?

There's no single good CPC because it depends entirely on your campaign objective. For traffic campaigns, recent benchmark data puts CPC around $0.70. For lead-gen, around $1.92 is a more realistic reference point. For blended ecommerce, CPC can sit below $1 in some datasets. The right benchmark is the one that matches your objective and vertical, not the first number you find on Google. For strategies to bring your CPC down, our guide to reducing Facebook ads CPA covers the full diagnostic.

What Is a Good Facebook CPM in 2026?

For blended ecommerce, recent benchmark work puts CPM around the mid-teens. But objective-level and country-level numbers move a lot. Awareness can sit around $10-$15, sales can be $20-$30, and lead-gen can be $30-$45 in objective-level benchmarks. Country mix can push the same account much higher or lower depending on where your audience lives. Our CPM benchmarks by industry guide breaks this down with current data.

How Much Should a Small Business Spend on Facebook Ads?

Start from the result you want, not a random monthly number. If you need 30 leads and your real CPL is $30, your baseline budget is $900. If you want purchase optimization and your target CPA is $30, a single ad set that can reliably learn may need roughly $214/day. Small businesses can absolutely run Meta ads profitably, but lower-funnel campaigns get expensive fast when event volume is low. If your budget is tight, consider starting with traffic or lead-gen objectives and moving down-funnel as your data and budget grow. Our budget calculator helps you model these numbers for your specific situation.

What Is the Minimum Budget to Run Facebook Ads in 2026?

There's no single magic minimum, and that's the honest answer most guides dodge. The practical floor isn't a platform rule, it's whether your budget can feed the optimization event you picked. For a lower-funnel purchase campaign, the learning phase needs roughly 50 conversion events a week to stabilize, so at a $30 target CPA a single ad set realistically wants around $214/day to learn cleanly. If that's out of reach, don't force it. Start with a traffic or lead-gen objective, where a few hundred dollars a month can buy enough events to actually optimize, and move down-funnel as your data and budget grow.

Why Do Facebook Ad Costs Jump So Suddenly?

The usual reasons: seasonality (Q4 is the most competitive auction period), audience competition (more advertisers bidding on similar audiences), weak creative quality (which raises costs through lower quality rankings), budget changes that push ad sets back into the learning phase, and significant edits that reset learning. If your costs spiked overnight, check whether something changed in your account structure before blaming the platform. Our guide on fixing Facebook ads that aren't spending covers the diagnostic steps.

Are Facebook Ads Still Worth It in 2026?

Yes, but only if you approach them with the right budget, the right expectations, and the right creative testing velocity. Meta's auction is more competitive than it was five years ago, and CPMs have risen consistently. But the brands that test creative aggressively, consolidate their ad sets, and give the algorithm enough data to learn are still generating strong ROAS. The question isn't whether Facebook ads work. It's whether your budget and process are set up to let them work. For a scaling playbook, see our guide on how to scale Facebook ads profitably.

What Are Meta's New Location Fees in 2026?

Starting July 1, 2026, Meta will charge location fees of 2% to 5% on ads delivered in the UK, France, Italy, Spain, Austria, and Turkey. These fees are separate from your campaign budget and appear as a distinct line item on your invoice. They're essentially a regulatory pass-through cost that Meta is adding on top of your media spend for campaigns delivered in those specific countries.

Facebook Ad Costs 2026: What to Focus On

Facebook ad costs in 2026 aren't one number. They're a moving outcome of objective + geography + placement mix + creative quality + event volume.

The clean framework:

- Use CPC to forecast clicks.

- Use CPM to forecast reach.

- Use CPL/CPA to forecast business outcomes.

- Use the 50-events rule to decide whether your budget is actually enough for the optimization event you picked.

- And stop comparing your account to stale averages from old datasets.

If you want to model your own numbers, start with our free Facebook ad cost calculator.

And if the real problem isn't the benchmark but the speed of launching enough clean tests to find winning creative, AdManage helps teams bulk launch Meta ads and standardize execution so testing doesn't die inside native Ads Manager.

For related reading, check out our Facebook CPM benchmarks by industry guide for a closer look at industry-specific cost data, or explore how Facebook ads compare to TikTok ads for cross-platform budget planning.

Get started with AdManage and see what faster creative testing does to your real cost per acquisition.